Modulating Regularization Frequency for Efficient Compression-Aware Model Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While model compression is increasingly important because of large neural network size, compression-aware training is challenging as it needs sophisticated model modifications and longer training time.In this paper, we introduce regularization frequency (i.e., how often compression is performed during training) as a new regularization technique for a practical and efficient compression-aware training method. For various regularization techniques, such as weight decay and dropout, optimizing the regularization strength is crucial to improve generalization in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). While model compression also demands the right amount of regularization, the regularization strength incurred by model compression has been controlled only by compression ratio. Throughout various experiments, we show that regularization frequency critically affects the regularization strength of model compression. Combining regularization frequency and compression ratio, the amount of weight updates by model compression per mini-batch can be optimized to achieve the best model accuracy. Modulating regularization frequency is implemented by occasional model compression while conventional compression-aware training is usually performed for every mini-batch.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2021.
Builds on
25 of 38 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
- 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 676
- 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 618
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2015BinaryConnect: Training Deep Neural Networks with binary weights during propagationscited by 592
- 2018Soft Filter Pruning for Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 315
- 2017Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networkscited by 265
- 2014cuDNN: Efficient Primitives for Deep Learningcited by 245
13 more
- 2016Dynamic Network Surgery for Efficient DNNscited by 233
- 2017Incremental Network Quantization: Towards Lossless CNNs with Low-Precision Weightscited by 217
- 2016Trained Ternary Quantizationcited by 208
- 2014Speeding-up Convolutional Neural Networks Using Fine-tuned CP-Decompositioncited by 203
- 2015Compression of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast and Low Power Mobile Applicationscited by 162
- 2017L2 Regularization versus Batch and Weight Normalizationcited by 124
- 2018Three Mechanisms of Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 113
- 2016TensorLy: Tensor Learning in Pythoncited by 104
- 2018Revisiting Small Batch Training for Deep Neural Networkscited by 102
- 2018Alternating Multi-bit Quantization for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 31
- 2017Network Sketching: Exploiting Binary Structure in Deep CNNscited by 22
- 2017MEC: Memory-efficient Convolution for Deep Neural Networkcited by 14
- 2018ReLeQ: A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Deep Quantization of Neural Networkscited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.