Surveilling Surveillance: Estimating the Prevalence of Surveillance Cameras with Street View Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The use of video surveillance in public spaces -- both by government agencies and by private citizens -- has attracted considerable attention in recent years, particularly in light of rapid advances in face-recognition technology. But it has been difficult to systematically measure the prevalence and placement of cameras, hampering efforts to assess the implications of surveillance on privacy and public safety. Here, we combine computer vision, human verification, and statistical analysis to estimate the spatial distribution of surveillance cameras. Specifically, we build a camera detection model and apply it to 1.6 million street view images sampled from 10 large U.S. cities and 6 other major cities around the world, with positive model detections verified by human experts. After adjusting for the estimated recall of our model, and accounting for the spatial coverage of our sampled images, we are able to estimate the density of surveillance cameras visible from the road. Across the 16 cities we consider, the estimated number of surveillance cameras per linear kilometer ranges from 0.2 (in Los Angeles) to 0.9 (in Seoul). In a detailed analysis of the 10 U.S. cities, we find that cameras are concentrated in commercial, industrial, and mixed zones, and in neighborhoods with higher shares of non-white residents -- a pattern that persists even after adjusting for land use. These results help inform ongoing discussions on the use of surveillance technology, including its potential disparate impacts on communities of color.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2021.
Builds on
10 of 42 references.
References · 10
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
- 2016OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networkscited by 109
- 2020Cars Can't Fly up in the Sky: Improving Urban-Scene Segmentation via Height-driven Attention Networkscited by 70
- 2017Using Deep Learning and Google Street View to Estimate the Demographic Makeup of the UScited by 66
- 2018Building Instance Classification Using Street View Imagescited by 33
- 2020Effective Data Fusion with Generalized Vegetation Index: Evidence from Land Cover Segmentation in Agriculturecited by 8
- 2015Layered Interpretation of Street View Imagescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025WeatherBench: A Real-World Benchmark Dataset for All-in-One Adverse Weather Image Restorationcited by 20
- 2021Traffic-Net: 3D Traffic Monitoring Using a Single Cameracited by 4
- 2025Bayesian Modeling of Zero-Shot Classifications for Urban Flood Detectioncited by 2
- 2025A Privacy Enhancing Technique to Evade Detection by Street Video Cameras Without Using Adversarial Accessoriescited by 0
- 2025WeatherBench: A Real-World Benchmark Dataset for All-in-One Adverse Weather Image Restoration15 Sep 2025
- 2025Bayesian Modeling of Zero-Shot Classifications for Urban Flood Detection18 Mar 2025
- 2025A Privacy Enhancing Technique to Evade Detection by Street Video Cameras Without Using Adversarial Accessories26 Jan 2025
- 2021Traffic-Net: 3D Traffic Monitoring Using a Single Camera19 Sep 2021