mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reducing Bus Bunching with Asynchronous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2105.00376 ↗First posted 2 May 2021cs.LG cs.MAcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The bus system is a critical component of sustainable urban transportation. However, due to the significant uncertainties in passenger demand and traffic conditions, bus operation is unstable in nature and bus bunching has become a common phenomenon that undermines the reliability and efficiency of bus services. Despite recent advances in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) on traffic control, little research has focused on bus fleet control due to the tricky asynchronous characteristic -- control actions only happen when a bus arrives at a bus stop and thus agents do not act simultaneously. In this study, we formulate route-level bus fleet control as an asynchronous multi-agent reinforcement learning (ASMR) problem and extend the classical actor-critic architecture to handle the asynchronous issue. Specifically, we design a novel critic network to effectively approximate the marginal contribution for other agents, in which graph attention neural network is used to conduct inductive learning for policy evaluation. The critic structure also helps the ego agent optimize its policy more efficiently. We evaluate the proposed framework on real-world bus services and actual passenger demand derived from smart card data. Our results show that the proposed model outperforms both traditional headway-based control methods and existing MARL methods.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2021.

Builds on

10 of 28 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  5. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  6. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  7. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
  8. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  9. 2019Shapley Q-value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Gamescited by 71
  10. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning for Event-Driven Multi-Agent Decision Processescited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.