mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Combating small molecule aggregation with machine learning

arXiv 2105.00267 ↗First posted 1 May 2021q-bio.QM cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Biological screens are plagued by false positive hits resulting from aggregation. Thus, methods to triage small colloidally aggregating molecules (SCAMs) are in high demand. Herein, we disclose a bespoke machine-learning tool to confidently and intelligibly flag such entities. Our data demonstrate an unprecedented utility of machine learning for predicting SCAMs, achieving 80% of correct predictions in a challenging out-of-sample validation. The tool outperformed a panel of expert chemists, who correctly predicted 61 +/- 7% of the same test molecules in a Turing-like test. Further, the computational routine provided insight into molecular features governing aggregation that had remained hidden to expert intuition. Leveraging our tool, we quantify that up to 15-20% of ligands in publicly available chemogenomic databases have the high potential to aggregate at typical screening concentrations, imposing caution in systems biology and drug design programs. Our approach provides a means to augment human intuition, mitigate attrition and a pathway to accelerate future molecular medicine.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2021.

Builds on

3 of 64 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2018Molecular Sets (MOSES): A Benchmarking Platform for Molecular Generation Modelscited by 275
  3. 2017Learning to Plan Chemical Synthesescited by 179

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.