mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Using Small MUSes to Explain How to Solve Pen and Paper Puzzles

arXiv 2104.15040 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2021cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we present Demystify, a general tool for creating human-interpretable step-by-step explanations of how to solve a wide range of pen and paper puzzles from a high-level logical description. Demystify is based on Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets (MUSes), which allow Demystify to solve puzzles as a series of logical deductions by identifying which parts of the puzzle are required to progress. This paper makes three contributions over previous work. First, we provide a generic input language, based on the Essence constraint language, which allows us to easily use MUSes to solve a much wider range of pen and paper puzzles. Second, we demonstrate that the explanations that Demystify produces match those provided by humans by comparing our results with those provided independently by puzzle experts on a range of puzzles. We compare Demystify to published guides for solving a range of different pen and paper puzzles and show that by using MUSes, Demystify produces solving strategies which closely match human-produced guides to solving those same puzzles (on average 89% of the time). Finally, we introduce a new randomised algorithm to find MUSes for more difficult puzzles. This algorithm is focused on optimised search for individual small MUSes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2021.

Builds on

3 of 57 references.

References · 3

  1. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  2. 2014Difficulty Rating of Sudoku Puzzles: An Overview and Evaluationcited by 4
  3. 2014Computing Small Unsatisfiable Cores in Satisfiability Modulo Theoriescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.