mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Contrastive Models for Instance-based Image Retrieval

arXiv 2104.14939 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2021cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we evaluate contrastive models for the task of image retrieval. We hypothesise that models that are learned to encode semantic similarity among instances via discriminative learning should perform well on the task of image retrieval, where relevancy is defined in terms of instances of the same object. Through our extensive evaluation, we find that representations from models trained using contrastive methods perform on-par with (and outperforms) a pre-trained supervised baseline trained on the ImageNet labels in retrieval tasks under various configurations. This is remarkable given that the contrastive models require no explicit supervision. Thus, we conclude that these models can be used to bootstrap base models to build more robust image retrieval engines.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2021.

Builds on

28 of 45 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  7. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  8. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  9. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  10. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  11. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 733
  12. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 552
16 more
  1. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 422
  2. 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
  3. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  4. 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 189
  5. 2019Learning with Average Precision: Training Image Retrieval with a Listwise Losscited by 184
  6. 2015Particular object retrieval with integral max-pooling of CNN activationscited by 160
  7. 2016Deep Image Retrieval: Learning global representations for image searchcited by 147
  8. 2016End-to-end Learning of Deep Visual Representations for Image Retrievalcited by 122
  9. 2016CNN Image Retrieval Learns from BoW: Unsupervised Fine-Tuning with Hard Examplescited by 58
  10. 2016Efficient Diffusion on Region Manifolds: Recovering Small Objects with Compact CNN Representationscited by 49
  11. 2014Multi-scale Orderless Pooling of Deep Convolutional Activation Featurescited by 38
  12. 2018Efficient Image Retrieval via Decoupling Diffusion into Online and Offline Processingcited by 20
  13. 2014Factors of Transferability for a Generic ConvNet Representationcited by 14
  14. 2016Bags of Local Convolutional Features for Scalable Instance Searchcited by 13
  15. 2014Neural Codes for Image Retrievalcited by 3
  16. 2015Multiple Measurements and Joint Dimensionality Reduction for Large Scale Image Search with Short Vectors - Extended Versioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.