Random Embeddings and Linear Regression can Predict Protein Function
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large self-supervised models pretrained on millions of protein sequences have recently gained popularity in generating embeddings of protein sequences for protein function prediction. However, the absence of random baselines makes it difficult to conclude whether pretraining has learned useful information for protein function prediction. Here we show that one-hot encoding and random embeddings, both of which do not require any pretraining, are strong baselines for protein function prediction across 14 diverse sequence-to-function tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2021.
Builds on
11 of 42 references.
References · 11
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPEcited by 229
- 2020ProtTrans: Towards Cracking the Language of Life's Code Through Self-Supervised Deep Learning and High Performance Computingcited by 162
- 2019Do NLP Models Know Numbers? Probing Numeracy in Embeddingscited by 157
- 2019Learning protein sequence embeddings using information from structurecited by 50
- 2019No Training Required: Exploring Random Encoders for Sentence Classificationcited by 30
- 2020Is Transfer Learning Necessary for Protein Landscape Prediction?cited by 27
- 2016A Powerful Generative Model Using Random Weights for the Deep Image Representationcited by 14
- 2020On the impressive performance of randomly weighted encoders in summarization taskscited by 3
- 2020How Powerful Are Randomly Initialized Pointcloud Set Functions?cited by 3
- 2019J-Net: Randomly weighted U-Net for audio source separationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.