mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Fairness in Speaker Recognition

arXiv 2104.14067 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2021cs.SD cs.AI eess.AScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The human voice conveys unique characteristics of an individual, making voice biometrics a key technology for verifying identities in various industries. Despite the impressive progress of speaker recognition systems in terms of accuracy, a number of ethical and legal concerns has been raised, specifically relating to the fairness of such systems. In this paper, we aim to explore the disparity in performance achieved by state-of-the-art deep speaker recognition systems, when different groups of individuals characterized by a common sensitive attribute (e.g., gender) are considered. In order to mitigate the unfairness we uncovered by means of an exploratory study, we investigate whether balancing the representation of the different groups of individuals in the training set can lead to a more equal treatment of these demographic groups. Experiments on two state-of-the-art neural architectures and a large-scale public dataset show that models trained with demographically-balanced training sets exhibit a fairer behavior on different groups, while still being accurate. Our study is expected to provide a solid basis for instilling beyond-accuracy objectives (e.g., fairness) in speaker recognition.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2021.

Builds on

9 of 15 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  3. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  4. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  5. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  6. 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
  7. 2020SensitiveLoss: Improving Accuracy and Fairness of Face Representations with Discrimination-Aware Deep Learningcited by 50
  8. 2020InsideBias: Measuring Bias in Deep Networks and Application to Face Gender Biometricscited by 31
  9. 2019Deep learning methods in speaker recognition: a reviewcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 3.

5 papers.