Sifting out the features by pruning: Are convolutional networks the winning lottery ticket of fully connected ones?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pruning methods can considerably reduce the size of artificial neural networks without harming their performance. In some cases, they can even uncover sub-networks that, when trained in isolation, match or surpass the test accuracy of their dense counterparts. Here we study the inductive bias that pruning imprints in such "winning lottery tickets". Focusing on visual tasks, we analyze the architecture resulting from iterative magnitude pruning of a simple fully connected network (FCN). We show that the surviving node connectivity is local in input space, and organized in patterns reminiscent of the ones found in convolutional networks (CNN). We investigate the role played by data and tasks in shaping the architecture of pruned sub-networks. Our results show that the winning lottery tickets of FCNs display the key features of CNNs. The ability of such automatic network-simplifying procedure to recover the key features "hand-crafted" in the design of CNNs suggests interesting applications to other datasets and tasks, in order to discover new and efficient architectural inductive biases.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2021.
Builds on
33 of 46 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
21 more
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
- 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 521
- 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
- 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
- 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
- 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 238
- 2019Deconstructing Lottery Tickets: Zeros, Signs, and the Supermaskcited by 206
- 2019Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Towards More Efficient Training of Deep Networkscited by 160
- 2020Dynamic Model Pruning with Feedbackcited by 125
- 2020The Early Phase of Neural Network Trainingcited by 114
- 2019One ticket to win them all: generalizing lottery ticket initializations across datasets and optimizerscited by 102
- 2017Deep Learning for Time-Series Analysiscited by 55
- 2020Towards Learning Convolutions from Scratchcited by 46
- 2019Finding the Needle in the Haystack with Convolutions: on the benefits of architectural biascited by 19
- 2020On the Transferability of Winning Tickets in Non-Natural Image Datasetscited by 10
- 2021Robustness to Pruning Predicts Generalization in Deep Neural Networkscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
3 papers.