A modularity comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Morphognosis neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study compares the modularity performance of two artificial neural network architectures: a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent network, and Morphognosis, a neural network based on a hierarchy of spatial and temporal contexts. Mazes are used to measure performance, defined as the ability to utilize independently learned mazes to solve mazes composed of them. A maze is a sequence of rooms connected by doors. The modular task is implemented as follows: at the beginning of the maze, an initial door choice forms a context that must be retained until the end of an intervening maze, where the same door must be chosen again to reach the goal. For testing, the door-association mazes and separately trained intervening mazes are presented together for the first time. While both neural networks perform well during training, the testing performance of Morphognosis is significantly better than LSTM on this modular task.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2021.
Builds on
4 of 31 references.
References · 4
- 2018An Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 201
- 2018Modular Networks: Learning to Decompose Neural Computationcited by 62
- 2018Automatically Composing Representation Transformations as a Means for Generalizationcited by 35
- 2015Training artificial neural networks to learn a nondeterministic gamecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.