Deep Gaussian Processes for Biogeophysical Parameter Retrieval and Model Inversion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Parameter retrieval and model inversion are key problems in remote sensing and Earth observation. Currently, different approximations exist: a direct, yet costly, inversion of radiative transfer models (RTMs); the statistical inversion with in situ data that often results in problems with extrapolation outside the study area; and the most widely adopted hybrid modeling by which statistical models, mostly nonlinear and non-parametric machine learning algorithms, are applied to invert RTM simulations. We will focus on the latter. Among the different existing algorithms, in the last decade kernel based methods, and Gaussian Processes (GPs) in particular, have provided useful and informative solutions to such RTM inversion problems. This is in large part due to the confidence intervals they provide, and their predictive accuracy. However, RTMs are very complex, highly nonlinear, and typically hierarchical models, so that often a shallow GP model cannot capture complex feature relations for inversion. This motivates the use of deeper hierarchical architectures, while still preserving the desirable properties of GPs. This paper introduces the use of deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) for bio-geo-physical model inversion. Unlike shallow GP models, DGPs account for complicated (modular, hierarchical) processes, provide an efficient solution that scales well to big datasets, and improve prediction accuracy over their single layer counterpart. In the experimental section, we provide empirical evidence of performance for the estimation of surface temperature and dew point temperature from infrared sounding data, as well as for the prediction of chlorophyll content, inorganic suspended matter, and coloured dissolved matter from multispectral data acquired by the Sentinel-3 OLCI sensor. The presented methodology allows for more expressive forms of GPs in remote sensing model inversion problems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2021.
Builds on
15 of 62 references.
References · 15
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 377
- 2017Doubly Stochastic Variational Inference for Deep Gaussian Processescited by 143
- 2016Understanding Probabilistic Sparse Gaussian Process Approximationscited by 68
- 2020Physics-Aware Gaussian Processes in Remote Sensingcited by 14
- 2019Scalable Training of Inference Networks for Gaussian-Process Modelscited by 8
- 2020A Perspective on Gaussian Processes for Earth Observationcited by 8
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Classification with Large Scale Gaussian Processescited by 5
- 2016Dimensionality Reduction via Regression in Hyperspectral Imagerycited by 4
- 2020Accounting for Input Noise in Gaussian Process Parameter Retrievalcited by 4
- 2020Spectral band selection for vegetation properties retrieval using Gaussian processes regressioncited by 2
- 2015Semi-described and semi-supervised learning with Gaussian processescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Probabilistic Attention based on Gaussian Processes for Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 8
- 2025Probabilistic Machine Learning for Noisy Labels in Earth Observationcited by 6
- 2025On the Generalization of Representation Uncertainty in Earth Observationcited by 1
- 2026GeoDose-CP: Graph-Local Conformal Inference for Continuous-Treatment Earth Observationcited by 0
- 2026GeoDose-CP: Graph-Local Conformal Inference for Continuous-Treatment Earth Observation24 Sep 2026
- 2025Probabilistic Machine Learning for Noisy Labels in Earth Observation4 Apr 2025
- 2025On the Generalization of Representation Uncertainty in Earth Observation10 Mar 2025
- 2023Probabilistic Attention based on Gaussian Processes for Deep Multiple Instance Learning8 Feb 2023