What can human minimal videos tell us about dynamic recognition models?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In human vision objects and their parts can be visually recognized from purely spatial or purely temporal information but the mechanisms integrating space and time are poorly understood. Here we show that human visual recognition of objects and actions can be achieved by efficiently combining spatial and motion cues in configurations where each source on its own is insufficient for recognition. This analysis is obtained by identifying minimal videos: these are short and tiny video clips in which objects, parts, and actions can be reliably recognized, but any reduction in either space or time makes them unrecognizable. State-of-the-art deep networks for dynamic visual recognition cannot replicate human behavior in these configurations. This gap between humans and machines points to critical mechanisms in human dynamic vision that are lacking in current models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2021.
Builds on
10 of 45 references.
References · 10
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
- 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
- 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
- 2017Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?cited by 551
- 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 484
- 2016Convolutional Two-Stream Network Fusion for Video Action Recognitioncited by 384
- 2016Spatiotemporal Residual Networks for Video Action Recognitioncited by 91
- 2015P-CNN: Pose-based CNN Features for Action Recognitioncited by 58
- 2016Joint Optical Flow and Temporally Consistent Semantic Segmentationcited by 19
- 2014Sensitivity to Timing and Order in Human Visual Cortexcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Temporal vs. Spatial: Comparing DINOv3 and V-JEPA2 Feature Representations for Video Action Analysiscited by 2
- 2021Human-like Relational Models for Activity Recognition in Videocited by 1
- 2026Human-AI Divergence in Ego-centric Action Recognition under Spatial and Spatiotemporal Manipulationscited by 0
- 2026Human-AI Divergence in Ego-centric Action Recognition under Spatial and Spatiotemporal Manipulations9 Mar 2026
- 2025Temporal vs. Spatial: Comparing DINOv3 and V-JEPA2 Feature Representations for Video Action Analysis25 Sep 2025
- 2021Human-like Relational Models for Activity Recognition in Video12 Jul 2021