mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

No comments: Addressing commentary sections in websites' analyses

arXiv 2104.09113 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Removing or extracting the commentary sections from a series of websites is a tedious task, as no standard way to code them is widely adopted. This operation is thus very rarely performed. In this paper, we show that these commentary sections can induce significant biases in the analyses, especially in the case of controversial Highlights bullet Commentary sections can induce biases in the analysis of websites' contents bullet Analyzing these sections can be interesting per se. bullet We illustrate these points using a corpus of anti-vaccine websites. bullet We provide guidelines to remove or extract these sections.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2021.

Builds on

1 of 22 references.

References · 1

  1. 2019Asymmetric participation of defenders and critics of vaccines to debates on French-speaking Twittercited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.