mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who Responded to Whom: The Joint Effects of Latent Topics and Discourse in Conversation Structure

arXiv 2104.08601 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2021cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous online conversations are produced on a daily basis, resulting in a pressing need to conversation understanding. As a basis to structure a discussion, we identify the responding relations in the conversation discourse, which link response utterances to their initiations. To figure out who responded to whom, here we explore how the consistency of topic contents and dependency of discourse roles indicate such interactions, whereas most prior work ignore the effects of latent factors underlying word occurrences. We propose a model to learn latent topics and discourse in word distributions, and predict pairwise initiation-response links via exploiting topic consistency and discourse dependency. Experimental results on both English and Chinese conversations show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the arts, such as 79 vs. 73 MRR on Chinese customer service dialogues. We further probe into our outputs and shed light on how topics and discourse indicate conversational user interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2021.

Builds on

10 of 28 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Learning Discourse-level Diversity for Neural Dialog Models using Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 222
  2. 2016Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussionscited by 106
  3. 2017Discovering Discrete Latent Topics with Neural Variational Inferencecited by 79
  4. 2018Unsupervised Discrete Sentence Representation Learning for Interpretable Neural Dialog Generationcited by 34
  5. 2017Best of Both Worlds: Transferring Knowledge from Discriminative Learning to a Generative Visual Dialog Modelcited by 19
  6. 2017Joint Modeling of Content and Discourse Relations in Dialoguescited by 6
  7. 2019What You Say and How You Say it: Joint Modeling of Topics and Discourse in Microblog Conversationscited by 5
  8. 2017Find the Conversation Killers: a Predictive Study of Thread-ending Postscited by 4
  9. 2016Discovering Conversational Dependencies between Messages in Dialogscited by 2
  10. 2018A Joint Model of Conversational Discourse and Latent Topics on Microblogscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.