mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Integrating Domain Knowledge in Data-driven Earth Observation with Process Convolutions

arXiv 2104.08134 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The modelling of Earth observation data is a challenging problem, typically approached by either purely mechanistic or purely data-driven methods. Mechanistic models encode the domain knowledge and physical rules governing the system. Such models, however, need the correct specification of all interactions between variables in the problem and the appropriate parameterization is a challenge in itself. On the other hand, machine learning approaches are flexible data-driven tools, able to approximate arbitrarily complex functions, but lack interpretability and struggle when data is scarce or in extrapolation regimes. In this paper, we argue that hybrid learning schemes that combine both approaches can address all these issues efficiently. We introduce Gaussian process (GP) convolution models for hybrid modelling in Earth observation (EO) problems. We specifically propose the use of a class of GP convolution models called latent force models (LFMs) for EO time series modelling, analysis and understanding. LFMs are hybrid models that incorporate physical knowledge encoded in differential equations into a multioutput GP model. LFMs can transfer information across time-series, cope with missing observations, infer explicit latent functions forcing the system, and learn parameterizations which are very helpful for system analysis and interpretability. We consider time series of soil moisture from active (ASCAT) and passive (SMOS, AMSR2) microwave satellites. We show how assuming a first order differential equation as governing equation, the model automatically estimates the e-folding time or decay rate related to soil moisture persistence and discovers latent forces related to precipitation. The proposed hybrid methodology reconciles the two main approaches in remote sensing parameter estimation by blending statistical learning and mechanistic modeling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2021.

Builds on

14 of 65 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  3. 2016Theory-guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Datacited by 169
  4. 2017Deep Learning for Physical Processes: Incorporating Prior Scientific Knowledgecited by 95
  5. 2013Structure Discovery in Nonparametric Regression through Compositional Kernel Searchcited by 86
  6. 2018Physics Guided RNNs for Modeling Dynamical Systems: A Case Study in Simulating Lake Temperature Profilescited by 55
  7. 2020Machine Learning Information Fusion in Earth Observation: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications and Data Sourcescited by 19
  8. 2020Physics-Aware Gaussian Processes in Remote Sensingcited by 14
  9. 2019Active emulation of computer codes with Gaussian processes -- Application to remote sensingcited by 11
  10. 2019Using Physics-Informed Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networks for Subgrid Modeling in Turbulent Reactive Flowscited by 8
  11. 2020A Perspective on Gaussian Processes for Earth Observationcited by 8
  12. 2017Joint Gaussian Processes for Biophysical Parameter Retrievalcited by 6
2 more
  1. 2020Fusing Optical and SAR time series for LAI gap filling with multioutput Gaussian processescited by 6
  2. 2020Mapping Leaf Area Index with a Smartphone and Gaussian Processescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.