mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fruit Quality and Defect Image Classification with Conditional GAN Data Augmentation

arXiv 2104.05647 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2021cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contemporary Artificial Intelligence technologies allow for the employment of Computer Vision to discern good crops from bad, providing a step in the pipeline of selecting healthy fruit from undesirable fruit, such as those which are mouldy or gangrenous. State-of-the-art works in the field report high accuracy results on small datasets (<1000 images), which are not representative of the population regarding real-world usage. The goals of this study are to further enable real-world usage by improving generalisation with data augmentation as well as to reduce overfitting and energy usage through model pruning. In this work, we suggest a machine learning pipeline that combines the ideas of fine-tuning, transfer learning, and generative model-based training data augmentation towards improving fruit quality image classification. A linear network topology search is performed to tune a VGG16 lemon quality classification model using a publicly-available dataset of 2690 images. We find that appending a 4096 neuron fully connected layer to the convolutional layers leads to an image classification accuracy of 83.77%. We then train a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network on the training data for 2000 epochs, and it learns to generate relatively realistic images. Grad-CAM analysis of the model trained on real photographs shows that the synthetic images can exhibit classifiable characteristics such as shape, mould, and gangrene. A higher image classification accuracy of 88.75% is then attained by augmenting the training with synthetic images, arguing that Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks have the ability to produce new data to alleviate issues of data scarcity. Finally, model pruning is performed via polynomial decay, where we find that the Conditional GAN-augmented classification network can retain 81.16% classification accuracy when compressed to 50% of its original size.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2021.

Builds on

10 of 58 references.

References · 10

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  5. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  6. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
  7. 2018GAN-based Synthetic Medical Image Augmentation for increased CNN Performance in Liver Lesion Classificationcited by 242
  8. 2017Fruit recognition from images using deep learningcited by 35
  9. 2019Combining Noise-to-Image and Image-to-Image GANs: Brain MR Image Augmentation for Tumor Detectioncited by 23
  10. 2017Augmentor: An Image Augmentation Library for Machine Learningcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

9 papers.