A Conceptual Framework for Establishing Trust in Real World Intelligent Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Intelligent information systems that contain emergent elements often encounter trust problems because results do not get sufficiently explained and the procedure itself can not be fully retraced. This is caused by a control flow depending either on stochastic elements or on the structure and relevance of the input data. Trust in such algorithms can be established by letting users interact with the system so that they can explore results and find patterns that can be compared with their expected solution. Reflecting features and patterns of human understanding of a domain against algorithmic results can create awareness of such patterns and may increase the trust that a user has in the solution. If expectations are not met, close inspection can be used to decide whether a solution conforms to the expectations or whether it goes beyond the expected. By either accepting or rejecting a solution, the user's set of expectations evolves and a learning process for the users is established. In this paper we present a conceptual framework that reflects and supports this process. The framework is the result of an analysis of two exemplary case studies from two different disciplines with information systems that assist experts in their complex tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2021.
Builds on
9 of 53 references.
References · 9
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 425
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
- 2020One Explanation Does Not Fit All: The Promise of Interactive Explanations for Machine Learning Transparencycited by 64
- 2018Detecting and interpreting myocardial infarction using fully convolutional neural networkscited by 19
- 2018Abductive reasoning as the basis to reproduce expert criteria in ECG Atrial Fibrillation identificationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.