Model Compression for Dynamic Forecast Combination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The predictive advantage of combining several different predictive models is widely accepted. Particularly in time series forecasting problems, this combination is often dynamic to cope with potential non-stationary sources of variation present in the data. Despite their superior predictive performance, ensemble methods entail two main limitations: high computational costs and lack of transparency. These issues often preclude the deployment of such approaches, in favour of simpler yet more efficient and reliable ones. In this paper, we leverage the idea of model compression to address this problem in time series forecasting tasks. Model compression approaches have been mostly unexplored for forecasting. Their application in time series is challenging due to the evolving nature of the data. Further, while the literature focuses on neural networks, we apply model compression to distinct types of methods. In an extensive set of experiments, we show that compressing dynamic forecasting ensembles into an individual model leads to a comparable predictive performance and a drastic reduction in computational costs. Further, the compressed individual model with best average rank is a rule-based regression model. Thus, model compression also leads to benefits in terms of model interpretability. The experiments carried in this paper are fully reproducible.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2021.
Builds on
13 of 64 references.
References · 13
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2017Deep Mutual Learningcited by 621
- 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
- 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 171
- 2015Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?cited by 116
- 2016Time for a change: a tutorial for comparing multiple classifiers through Bayesian analysiscited by 92
- 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
- 2019Evaluating time series forecasting models: An empirical study on performance estimation methodscited by 52
- 2018Improving the Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks with Knowledge Distillationcited by 37
- 2019Machine Learning vs Statistical Methods for Time Series Forecasting: Size Matterscited by 10
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.