mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks via Denoising and Compression

arXiv 2104.01494 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2021cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gradient-based adversarial attacks on deep neural networks pose a serious threat, since they can be deployed by adding imperceptible perturbations to the test data of any network, and the risk they introduce cannot be assessed through the network's original training performance. Denoising and dimensionality reduction are two distinct methods that have been independently investigated to combat such attacks. While denoising offers the ability to tailor the defense to the specific nature of the attack, dimensionality reduction offers the advantage of potentially removing previously unseen perturbations, along with reducing the training time of the network being defended. We propose strategies to combine the advantages of these two defense mechanisms. First, we propose the cascaded defense, which involves denoising followed by dimensionality reduction. To reduce the training time of the defense for a small trade-off in performance, we propose the hidden layer defense, which involves feeding the output of the encoder of a denoising autoencoder into the network. Further, we discuss how adaptive attacks against these defenses could become significantly weak when an alternative defense is used, or when no defense is used. In this light, we propose a new metric to evaluate a defense which measures the sensitivity of the adaptive attack to modifications in the defense. Finally, we present a guideline for building an ordered repertoire of defenses, a.k.a. a defense infrastructure, that adjusts to limited computational resources in presence of uncertainty about the attack strategy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2021.

Builds on

19 of 26 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  3. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  4. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  5. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  6. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  7. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
  8. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  9. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  10. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  11. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  12. 2017Keeping the Bad Guys Out: Protecting and Vaccinating Deep Learning with JPEG Compressioncited by 86
7 more
  1. 2017APE-GAN: Adversarial Perturbation Elimination with GANcited by 57
  2. 2017Houdini: Fooling Deep Structured Prediction Modelscited by 50
  3. 2017Enhancing Robustness of Machine Learning Systems via Data Transformationscited by 38
  4. 2015Understanding Adversarial Training: Increasing Local Stability of Neural Nets through Robust Optimizationcited by 32
  5. 2017Blocking Transferability of Adversarial Examples in Black-Box Learning Systemscited by 19
  6. 2017Cascade Adversarial Machine Learning Regularized with a Unified Embeddingcited by 13
  7. 2018Combatting Adversarial Attacks through Denoising and Dimensionality Reduction: A Cascaded Autoencoder Approachcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.