mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Representations of Language Varieties Are Reliable Given Corpus Similarity Measures

arXiv 2104.01294 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2021cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper measures similarity both within and between 84 language varieties across nine languages. These corpora are drawn from digital sources (the web and tweets), allowing us to evaluate whether such geo-referenced corpora are reliable for modelling linguistic variation. The basic idea is that, if each source adequately represents a single underlying language variety, then the similarity between these sources should be stable across all languages and countries. The paper shows that there is a consistent agreement between these sources using frequency-based corpus similarity measures. This provides further evidence that digital geo-referenced corpora consistently represent local language varieties.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2021.

Builds on

6 of 28 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Mapping Languages: The Corpus of Global Language Usecited by 42
  2. 2017Dialectometric analysis of language variation in Twittercited by 14
  3. 2019Modeling Global Syntactic Variation in English Using Dialect Classificationcited by 13
  4. 2013Where in the World are You? Geolocation and Language Identification in Twittercited by 11
  5. 2020Mapping Languages and Demographics with Georeferenced Corporacited by 6
  6. 2013Using Robust PCA to estimate regional characteristics of language use from geo-tagged Twitter messagescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

10 papers.