mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ensemble-in-One: Learning Ensemble within Random Gated Networks for Enhanced Adversarial Robustness

arXiv 2103.14795 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.CR cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial attacks have rendered high security risks on modern deep learning systems. Adversarial training can significantly enhance the robustness of neural network models by suppressing the non-robust features. However, the models often suffer from significant accuracy loss on clean data. Ensemble training methods have emerged as promising solutions for defending against adversarial attacks by diversifying the vulnerabilities among the sub-models, simultaneously maintaining comparable accuracy as standard training. However, existing ensemble methods are with poor scalability, owing to the rapid complexity increase when including more sub-models in the ensemble. Moreover, in real-world applications, it is difficult to deploy an ensemble with multiple sub-models, owing to the tight hardware resource budget and latency requirement. In this work, we propose ensemble-in-one (EIO), a simple but efficient way to train an ensemble within one random gated network (RGN). EIO augments the original model by replacing the parameterized layers with multi-path random gated blocks (RGBs) to construct a RGN. By diversifying the vulnerability of the numerous paths within the RGN, better robustness can be achieved. It provides high scalability because the paths within an EIO network exponentially increase with the network depth. Our experiments demonstrate that EIO consistently outperforms previous ensemble training methods with even less computational overhead.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2021.

Builds on

23 of 28 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  7. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  8. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 837
  9. 2018ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and Hardwarecited by 673
  10. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  12. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 383
11 more
  1. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  2. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 245
  3. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
  4. 2018Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defensecited by 171
  5. 2020Skip Connections Matter: On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Generated with ResNetscited by 167
  6. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 158
  7. 2020DVERGE: Diversifying Vulnerabilities for Enhanced Robust Generation of Ensemblescited by 73
  8. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness of Ensembles with Diversity Trainingcited by 69
  9. 2017Boosting Adversarial Attacks with Momentumcited by 24
  10. 2017Training Ensembles to Detect Adversarial Examplescited by 10
  11. 2018Adversarial Vision Challengecited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.