Using Eye-tracking Data to Predict Situation Awareness in Real Time during Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Situation awareness (SA) is critical to improving takeover performance during the transition period from automated driving to manual driving. Although many studies measured SA during or after the driving task, few studies have attempted to predict SA in real time in automated driving. In this work, we propose to predict SA during the takeover transition period in conditionally automated driving using eye-tracking and self-reported data. First, a tree ensemble machine learning model, named LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine), was used to predict SA. Second, in order to understand what factors influenced SA and how, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values of individual predictor variables in the LightGBM model were calculated. These SHAP values explained the prediction model by identifying the most important factors and their effects on SA, which further improved the model performance of LightGBM through feature selection. We standardized SA between 0 and 1 by aggregating three performance measures (i.e., placement, distance, and speed estimation of vehicles with regard to the ego-vehicle) of SA in recreating simulated driving scenarios, after 33 participants viewed 32 videos with six lengths between 1 and 20 s. Using only eye-tracking data, our proposed model outperformed other selected machine learning models, having a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 0.121, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.096, and a 0.719 correlation coefficient between the predicted SA and the ground truth. The code is available at https://github.com/refengchou/Situation-awareness-prediction. Our proposed model provided important implications on how to monitor and predict SA in real time in automated driving using eye-tracking data.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021Predicting Driver Takeover Time in Conditionally Automated Drivingcited by 4
- 2021Disengagement Cause-and-Effect Relationships Extraction Using an NLP Pipelinecited by 3
- 2024Enhancing End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems Through Synchronized Human Behavior Datacited by 3
- 2024Evaluating Driver Readiness in Conditionally Automated Vehicles from Eye-Tracking Data and Head Posecited by 2
- 2025Real-Time Assessment of Bystander Situation Awareness in Drone-Assisted First Aidcited by 0
- 2026GazeXPErT: An Expert Eye-tracking Dataset for Interpretable and Explainable AI in Oncologic FDG-PET/CT Scanscited by 0
- 2026GazeXPErT: An Expert Eye-tracking Dataset for Interpretable and Explainable AI in Oncologic FDG-PET/CT Scans26 Feb 2026
- 2025Real-Time Assessment of Bystander Situation Awareness in Drone-Assisted First Aid3 Oct 2025
- 2024Enhancing End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems Through Synchronized Human Behavior Data20 Aug 2024
- 2024Evaluating Driver Readiness in Conditionally Automated Vehicles from Eye-Tracking Data and Head Pose20 Jan 2024
- 2021Disengagement Cause-and-Effect Relationships Extraction Using an NLP Pipeline5 Nov 2021
- 2021Predicting Driver Takeover Time in Conditionally Automated Driving20 Jul 2021