mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Polar Encodings for Arbitrary-Oriented Ship Detection in SAR Images

arXiv 2103.13151 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2021cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Common horizontal bounding box (HBB)-based methods are not capable of accurately locating slender ship targets with arbitrary orientations in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. Therefore, in recent years, methods based on oriented bounding box (OBB) have gradually received attention from researchers. However, most of the recently proposed deep learning-based methods for OBB detection encounter the boundary discontinuity problem in angle or key point regression. In order to alleviate this problem, researchers propose to introduce some manually set parameters or extra network branches for distinguishing the boundary cases, which make training more diffcult and lead to performance degradation. In this paper, in order to solve the boundary discontinuity problem in OBB regression, we propose to detect SAR ships by learning polar encodings. The encoding scheme uses a group of vectors pointing from the center of the ship target to the boundary points to represent an OBB. The boundary discontinuity problem is avoided by training and inference directly according to the polar encodings. In addition, we propose an Intersect over Union (IOU) -weighted regression loss, which further guides the training of polar encodings through the IOU metric and improves the detection performance. Experiments on the Rotating SAR Ship Detection Dataset (RSSDD) show that the proposed method can achieve better detection performance over other comparison algorithms and other OBB encoding schemes, demonstrating the effectiveness of our method.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2021.

Builds on

21 of 69 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  7. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  8. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  9. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  10. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  11. 2019Objects as Pointscited by 1,172
  12. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
9 more
  1. 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 622
  2. 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
  3. 2016R-FCN: Object Detection via Region-based Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 414
  4. 2019RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detectioncited by 264
  5. 2019Gliding vertex on the horizontal bounding box for multi-oriented object detectioncited by 134
  6. 2020Dense Label Encoding for Boundary Discontinuity Free Rotation Detectioncited by 79
  7. 2020Oriented Object Detection in Aerial Images with Box Boundary-Aware Vectorscited by 63
  8. 2020PolarDet: A Fast, More Precise Detector for Rotated Target in Aerial Imagescited by 25
  9. 2019Adaptive Period Embedding for Representing Oriented Objects in Aerial Imagescited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.