Learning physical properties of anomalous random walks using graph neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Single particle tracking allows probing how biomolecules interact physically with their natural environments. A fundamental challenge when analysing recorded single particle trajectories is the inverse problem of inferring the physical model or class of models of the underlying random walks. Reliable inference is made difficult by the inherent stochastic nature of single particle motion, by experimental noise, and by the short duration of most experimental trajectories. Model identification is further complicated by the fact that main physical properties of random walk models are only defined asymptotically, and are thus degenerate for short trajectories. Here, we introduce a new, fast approach to inferring random walk properties based on graph neural networks (GNNs). Our approach consists in associating a vector of features with each observed position, and a sparse graph structure with each observed trajectory. By performing simulation-based supervised learning on this construct [1], we show that we can reliably learn models of random walks and their anomalous exponents. The method can naturally be applied to trajectories of any length. We show its efficiency in analysing various anomalous random walks of biological relevance that were proposed in the AnDi challenge [2]. We explore how information is encoded in the GNN, and we show that it learns relevant physical features of the random walks. We furthermore evaluate its ability to generalize to types of trajectories not seen during training, and we show that the GNN retains high accuracy even with few parameters. We finally discuss the possibility to leverage these networks to analyse experimental data.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 131 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2021.
Builds on
21 of 131 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
- 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,220
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
9 more
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
- 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 624
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
- 2020Differentiable Graph Module (DGM) for Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 86
- 2016Nonparametric Bayesian inference of the microcanonical stochastic block modelcited by 21
- 2019A Survey on Graph Processing Accelerators: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 5
- 2017Construction of and efficient sampling from the simplicial configuration modelcited by 2
- 2018Modelling Point Spread Function in Fluorescence Microscopy with a Sparse Combination of Gaussian Mixture: Trade-off between Accuracy and Efficiencycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
10 papers.
- 2021Unsupervised learning of anomalous diffusion datacited by 8
- 2021WaveNet-Based Deep Neural Networks for the Characterization of Anomalous Diffusion (WADNet)cited by 7
- 2022Variational inference of fractional Brownian motion with linear computational complexitycited by 4
- 2023Preface: Characterisation of Physical Processes from Anomalous Diffusion Datacited by 3
- 2024Machine Learning Analysis of Anomalous Diffusioncited by 3
- 2023Machine-Learning Solutions for the Analysis of Single-Particle Diffusion Trajectoriescited by 2
- 2022Representation learning for a generalized, quantitative comparison of complex model outputscited by 1
- 2025Bottom-up Iterative Anomalous Diffusion Detector (BI-ADD)cited by 1
- 2025AnomalousNet: A Hybrid Approach with Attention U-Nets and Change Point Detection for Accurate Characterization of Anomalous Diffusion in Video Datacited by 1
- 2025Data-Efficient Learning of Anomalous Diffusion with Wavelet Representations: Enabling Direct Learning from Experimental Trajectoriescited by 0
- 2025Data-Efficient Learning of Anomalous Diffusion with Wavelet Representations: Enabling Direct Learning from Experimental Trajectories9 Dec 2025
- 2025AnomalousNet: A Hybrid Approach with Attention U-Nets and Change Point Detection for Accurate Characterization of Anomalous Diffusion in Video Data7 Apr 2025
- 2025Bottom-up Iterative Anomalous Diffusion Detector (BI-ADD)14 Mar 2025
- 2024Machine Learning Analysis of Anomalous Diffusion2 Dec 2024
- 2023Machine-Learning Solutions for the Analysis of Single-Particle Diffusion Trajectories18 Aug 2023
- 2023Preface: Characterisation of Physical Processes from Anomalous Diffusion Data2 Jan 2023
- 2022Representation learning for a generalized, quantitative comparison of complex model outputs12 Aug 2022
- 2022Variational inference of fractional Brownian motion with linear computational complexity15 Mar 2022
- 2021Unsupervised learning of anomalous diffusion data7 Aug 2021
- 2021WaveNet-Based Deep Neural Networks for the Characterization of Anomalous Diffusion (WADNet)14 Jun 2021