mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Space Lower Bounds for Approximating Maximum Matching in the Edge Arrival Model

arXiv 2103.11669 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2021cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The bipartite matching problem in the online and streaming settings has received a lot of attention recently. The classical vertex arrival setting, for which the celebrated Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani (KVV) algorithm achieves a 1-1/e approximation, is rather well understood: the 1-1/e approximation is optimal in both the online and semi-streaming setting, where the algorithm is constrained to use n· logO(1) n space. The more challenging the edge arrival model has seen significant progress recently in the online algorithms literature. For the strictly online model (no preemption) approximations better than trivial factor 1/2 have been ruled out [Gamlath et al'FOCS'19]. For the less restrictive online preemptive model a better than frac11+ln 2-approximation [Epstein et al'STACS'12] and even a better than (2-√2)-approximation[Huang et al'SODA'19] have been ruled out. The recent hardness results for online preemptive matching in the edge arrival model are based on the idea of stringing together multiple copies of a KVV hard instance using edge arrivals. In this paper, we show how to implement such constructions using ideas developed in the literature on Ruzsa-Szemer'edi graphs. As a result, we show that any single pass streaming algorithm that approximates the maximum matching in a bipartite graph with n vertices to a factor better than frac11+ln 2≈ 0.59 requires n1+Omega(1/loglog n)gg n logO(1) n space. This gives the first separation between the classical one sided vertex arrival setting and the edge arrival setting in the semi-streaming model.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.