mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating glioma growth predictions as a forward ranking problem

arXiv 2103.11651 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The problem of tumor growth prediction is challenging, but promising results have been achieved with both model-driven and statistical methods. In this work, we present a framework for the evaluation of growth predictions that focuses on the spatial infiltration patterns, and specifically evaluating a prediction of future growth. We propose to frame the problem as a ranking problem rather than a segmentation problem. Using the average precision as a metric, we can evaluate the results with segmentations while using the full spatiotemporal prediction. Furthermore, by separating the model goodness-of-fit from future predictive performance, we show that in some cases, a better fit of model parameters does not guarantee a better the predictive power.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2021.

Builds on

5 of 23 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
  2. 2019Automated brain extraction of multi-sequence MRI using artificial neural networkscited by 133
  3. 2018Personalized Radiotherapy Design for Glioblastoma: Integrating Mathematical Tumor Models, Multimodal Scans and Bayesian Inferencecited by 25
  4. 2019Neural parameters estimation for brain tumor growth modelingcited by 11
  5. 2019Deep Probabilistic Modeling of Glioma Growthcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.