Evaluating glioma growth predictions as a forward ranking problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of tumor growth prediction is challenging, but promising results have been achieved with both model-driven and statistical methods. In this work, we present a framework for the evaluation of growth predictions that focuses on the spatial infiltration patterns, and specifically evaluating a prediction of future growth. We propose to frame the problem as a ranking problem rather than a segmentation problem. Using the average precision as a metric, we can evaluate the results with segmentations while using the full spatiotemporal prediction. Furthermore, by separating the model goodness-of-fit from future predictive performance, we show that in some cases, a better fit of model parameters does not guarantee a better the predictive power.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2021.
Builds on
5 of 23 references.
References · 5
- 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
- 2019Automated brain extraction of multi-sequence MRI using artificial neural networkscited by 133
- 2018Personalized Radiotherapy Design for Glioblastoma: Integrating Mathematical Tumor Models, Multimodal Scans and Bayesian Inferencecited by 25
- 2019Neural parameters estimation for brain tumor growth modelingcited by 11
- 2019Deep Probabilistic Modeling of Glioma Growthcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.