mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Effectiveness of Morphology-aware Segmentation in Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2103.11189 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper evaluates the performance of several modern subword segmentation methods in a low-resource neural machine translation setting. We compare segmentations produced by applying BPE at the token or sentence level with morphologically-based segmentations from LMVR and MORSEL. We evaluate translation tasks between English and each of Nepali, Sinhala, and Kazakh, and predict that using morphologically-based segmentation methods would lead to better performance in this setting. However, comparing to BPE, we find that no consistent and reliable differences emerge between the segmentation methods. While morphologically-based methods outperform BPE in a few cases, what performs best tends to vary across tasks, and the performance of segmentation methods is often statistically indistinguishable.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2021.

Builds on

7 of 33 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  3. 2019Revisiting Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 61
  4. 2016Character-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
  5. 2017Linguistically Motivated Vocabulary Reduction for Neural Machine Translation from Turkish to Englishcited by 23
  6. 2018Compositional Representation of Morphologically-Rich Input for Neural Machine Translationcited by 12
  7. 2018Cognate-aware morphological segmentation for multilingual neural translationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort: