Quantum Pseudorandomness and Classical Complexity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We construct a quantum oracle relative to which mathsfBQP = mathsfQMA but cryptographic pseudorandom quantum states and pseudorandom unitary transformations exist, a counterintuitive result in light of the fact that pseudorandom states can be "broken" by quantum Merlin-Arthur adversaries. We explain how this nuance arises as the result of a distinction between algorithms that operate on quantum and classical inputs. On the other hand, we show that some computational complexity assumption is needed to construct pseudorandom states, by proving that pseudorandom states do not exist if mathsfBQP = mathsfPP. We discuss implications of these results for cryptography, complexity theory, and shadow tomography.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023A quantum tug of war between randomness and symmetries on homogeneous spacescited by 0
- 2024Noise-tolerant learnability of shallow quantum circuits from statistics and the cost of quantum pseudorandomnesscited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and morecited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more8 Oct 2025
- 2024Noise-tolerant learnability of shallow quantum circuits from statistics and the cost of quantum pseudorandomness20 May 2024
- 2023A quantum tug of war between randomness and symmetries on homogeneous spaces11 Sep 2023