Flexible FOND Planning with Explicit Fairness Assumptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of reaching a propositional goal condition in fully-observable non-deterministic (FOND) planning under a general class of fairness assumptions that are given explicitly. The fairness assumptions are of the form A/B and say that state trajectories that contain infinite occurrences of an action a from A in a state s and finite occurrence of actions from B, must also contain infinite occurrences of action a in s followed by each one of its possible outcomes. The infinite trajectories that violate this condition are deemed as unfair, and the solutions are policies for which all the fair trajectories reach a goal state. We show that strong and strong-cyclic FOND planning, as well as QNP planning, a planning model introduced recently for generalized planning, are all special cases of FOND planning with fairness assumptions of this form which can also be combined. FOND+ planning, as this form of planning is called, combines the syntax of FOND planning with some of the versatility of LTL for expressing fairness constraints. A new planner is implemented by reducing FOND+ planning to answer set programs, and the performance of the planner is evaluated in comparison with FOND and QNP planners, and LTL synthesis tools.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2021.
Builds on
8 of 44 references.
References · 8
- 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
- 2018Learning Features and Abstract Actions for Computing Generalized Planscited by 35
- 2019Qualitative Numeric Planning: Reductions and Complexitycited by 18
- 2019Generalized Planning: Non-Deterministic Abstractions and Trajectory Constraintscited by 8
- 2015A Symbolic SAT-based Algorithm for Almost-sure Reachability with Small Strategies in POMDPscited by 6
- 2019Practical Synthesis of Reactive Systems from LTL Specifications via Parity Gamescited by 5
- 2019Stochastic Fairness and Language-Theoretic Fairness in Planning on Nondeterministic Domainscited by 5
- 2020Multi-tier Automated Planning for Adaptive Behavior (Extended Version)cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Non-Deterministic Planning for Hyperproperty Verificationcited by 4
- 2022Stochastic Perturbations of Tabular Features for Non-Deterministic Inference with Automungecited by 1
- 2022Iterative Depth-First Search for Fully Observable Non-Deterministic Planningcited by 1
- 2022Fairness in Multi-Agent Planningcited by 1
- 2025An Automatic Sound and Complete Abstraction Method for Generalized Planning with Baggable Typescited by 1
- 2024Planning with Uncertainty: Symmetries, Policy Inference, and Solution Compressioncited by 0
- 2025An Automatic Sound and Complete Abstraction Method for Generalized Planning with Baggable Types25 Jan 2025
- 2024Non-Deterministic Planning for Hyperproperty Verification22 May 2024
- 2024Planning with Uncertainty: Symmetries, Policy Inference, and Solution Compression28 Mar 2024
- 2022Fairness in Multi-Agent Planning1 Dec 2022
- 2022Iterative Depth-First Search for Fully Observable Non-Deterministic Planning8 Apr 2022
- 2022Stochastic Perturbations of Tabular Features for Non-Deterministic Inference with Automunge18 Feb 2022