mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Second-Order Component Analysis for Fault Detection

arXiv 2103.07303 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.NEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Process monitoring based on neural networks is getting more and more attention. Compared with classical neural networks, high-order neural networks have natural advantages in dealing with heteroscedastic data. However, high-order neural networks might bring the risk of overfitting and learning both the key information from original data and noises or anomalies. Orthogonal constraints can greatly reduce correlations between extracted features, thereby reducing the overfitting risk. This paper proposes a novel fault detection method called second-order component analysis (SCA). SCA rules out the heteroscedasticity of pro-cess data by optimizing a second-order autoencoder with orthogonal constraints. In order to deal with this constrained optimization problem, a geometric conjugate gradient algorithm is adopted in this paper, which performs geometric optimization on the combination of Stiefel manifold and Euclidean manifold. Extensive experiments on the Tennessee-Eastman benchmark pro-cess show that SCA outperforms PCA, KPCA, and autoencoder in missed detection rate (MDR) and false alarm rate (FAR).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2021.

Builds on

4 of 44 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019Quadratic Autoencoder (Q-AE) for Low-dose CT Denoisingcited by 35
  2. 2018Universal Approximation with Quadratic Deep Networkscited by 29
  3. 2020An improved mixture of probabilistic PCA for nonlinear data-driven process monitoringcited by 6
  4. 2017Neural Component Analysis for Fault Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.