mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Flow Time Scheduling with Uncertain Processing Time

arXiv 2103.05604 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2021cs.DScited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of online scheduling on a single machine in order to minimize weighted flow time. The existing algorithms for this problem (STOC '01, SODA '03, FOCS '18) all require exact knowledge of the processing time of each job. This assumption is crucial, as even a slight perturbation of the processing time would lead to polynomial competitive ratio. However, this assumption very rarely holds in real-life scenarios. In this paper, we present the first algorithm for weighted flow time which do not require exact knowledge of the processing times of jobs. Specifically, we introduce the Scheduling with Predicted Processing Time (SPPT) problem, where the algorithm is given a prediction for the processing time of each job, instead of its real processing time. For the case of a constant factor distortion between the predictions and the real processing time, our algorithms match all the best known competitiveness bounds for weighted flow time -- namely O(log P), O(log D) and O(log W), where P,D,W are the maximum ratios of processing times, densities, and weights, respectively. For larger errors, the competitiveness of our algorithms degrades gracefully.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 8; 2023: 6; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

29 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Permutation Predictions for Non-Clairvoyant Schedulingcited by 22
  2. 2022Online Algorithms with Multiple Predictionscited by 22
  3. 2022Parsimonious Learning-Augmented Cachingcited by 19
  4. 2022Algorithms with Prediction Portfolioscited by 19
  5. 2025Online Scheduling for LLM Inference with KV Cache Constraintscited by 17
  6. 2022A Universal Error Measure for Input Predictions Applied to Online Graph Problemscited by 14
  7. 2023Sorting with Predictionscited by 14
  8. 2024Algorithms for Caching and MTS with reduced number of predictionscited by 12
  9. 2021Robustification of Online Graph Exploration Methodscited by 10
  10. 2022Smoothed Online Optimization with Unreliable Predictionscited by 10
  11. 2024Overcoming Brittleness in Pareto-Optimal Learning-Augmented Algorithmscited by 8
  12. 2023Minimalistic Predictions to Schedule Jobs with Online Precedence Constraintscited by 7
17 more
  1. 2024Non-clairvoyant Scheduling with Partial Predictionscited by 7
  2. 2024Learning-Augmented Algorithms for the Bahncard Problemcited by 7
  3. 2022Scheduling with Speed Predictionscited by 6
  4. 2023Speed-Oblivious Online Scheduling: Knowing (Precise) Speeds is not Necessarycited by 5
  5. 2023Online Dynamic Acknowledgement with Learned Predictionscited by 4
  6. 2025Queueing, Predictions, and LLMs: Challenges and Open Problemscited by 4
  7. 2022Scheduling with Predictionscited by 3
  8. 2024SkipPredict: When to Invest in Predictions for Schedulingcited by 3
  9. 2024Learning-Based Heavy Hitters and Flow Frequency Estimation in Streamscited by 3
  10. 2023Sorting and Hypergraph Orientation under Uncertainty with Predictionscited by 2
  11. 2023On Optimal Consistency-Robustness Trade-Off for Learning-Augmented Multi-Option Ski Rentalcited by 2
  12. 2025Capacity Planning and Scheduling for Jobs with Uncertainty in Resource Usage and Durationcited by 0
  13. 2026Robust and Consistent Ski Rental with Distributional Advicecited by 0
  14. 2026The Secretary Problem with a Stochastic Precursorcited by 0
  15. 2026Learning-Augmented Online Scheduling with Parsimonious Preemptioncited by 0
  16. 2026Learning-Augmented Algorithms: Guarantees, Construction Mechanisms, and System-Level Implicationscited by 0
  17. 2026Robust Non-Clairvoyant Scheduling with Classification Modelscited by 0