Bias-Corrected Peaks-Over-Threshold Estimation of the CVaR
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) is a useful risk measure in fields such as machine learning, finance, insurance, energy, etc. When measuring very extreme risk, the commonly used CVaR estimation method of sample averaging does not work well due to limited data above the value-at-risk (VaR), the quantile corresponding to the CVaR level. To mitigate this problem, the CVaR can be estimated by extrapolating above a lower threshold than the VaR using a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD), which is often referred to as the peaks-over-threshold (POT) approach. This method often requires a very high threshold to fit well, leading to high variance in estimation, and can induce significant bias if the threshold is chosen too low. In this paper, we derive a new expression for the GPD approximation error of the CVaR, a bias term induced by the choice of threshold, as well as a bias correction method for the estimated GPD parameters. This leads to the derivation of a new estimator for the CVaR that we prove to be asymptotically unbiased. In a practical setting, we show through experiments that our estimator provides a significant performance improvement compared with competing CVaR estimators in finite samples. As a consequence of our bias correction method, it is also shown that a much lower threshold can be selected without introducing significant bias. This allows a larger portion of data to be be used in CVaR estimation compared with the typical POT approach, leading to more stable estimates. As secondary results, a new estimator for a second-order parameter of heavy-tailed distributions is derived, as well as a confidence interval for the CVaR which enables quantifying the level of variability in our estimator.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2021.
Builds on
9 of 54 references.
References · 9
- 2014Optimizing the CVaR via Samplingcited by 98
- 2014Algorithms for CVaR Optimization in MDPscited by 98
- 2019Being Optimistic to Be Conservative: Quickly Learning a CVaR Policycited by 63
- 2019Distribution oblivious, risk-aware algorithms for multi-armed bandits with unbounded rewardscited by 19
- 2019Learning Robust Options by Conditional Value at Risk Optimizationcited by 16
- 2018Concentration bounds for empirical conditional value-at-risk: The unbounded casecited by 13
- 2019X-Armed Bandits: Optimizing Quantiles, CVaR and Other Riskscited by 7
- 2013Sequential Selection Procedures and False Discovery Rate Controlcited by 3
- 2018Calculating CVaR and bPOE for Common Probability Distributions With Application to Portfolio Optimization and Density Estimationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
3 papers.