mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Weakly-Labeled Rand Index

arXiv 2103.04872 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2021cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) surveys produce imagery with large regions of transition between seabed types. Due to these regions, it is difficult to label and segment the imagery and, furthermore, challenging to score the image segmentations appropriately. While there are many approaches to quantify performance in standard crisp segmentation schemes, drawing hard boundaries in remote sensing imagery where gradients and regions of uncertainty exist is inappropriate. These cases warrant weak labels and an associated appropriate scoring approach. In this paper, a labeling approach and associated modified version of the Rand index for weakly-labeled data is introduced to address these issues. Results are evaluated with the new index and compared to traditional segmentation evaluation methods. Experimental results on a SAS data set containing must-link and cannot-link labels show that our Weakly-Labeled Rand index scores segmentations appropriately in reference to qualitative performance and is more suitable than traditional quantitative metrics for scoring weakly-labeled data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2021.

Builds on

4 of 15 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016Superpixels: An Evaluation of the State-of-the-Artcited by 52
  2. 2013Information Theoretic Learning with Infinitely Divisible Kernelscited by 9
  3. 2017Possibilistic Fuzzy Local Information C-Means for Sonar Image Segmentationcited by 5
  4. 2019Comparison of Possibilistic Fuzzy Local Information C-Means and Possibilistic K-Nearest Neighbors for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Image Segmentationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.