Do you really code? Designing and Evaluating Screening Questions for Online Surveys with Programmers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recruiting professional programmers in sufficient numbers for research studies can be challenging because they often cannot spare the time, or due to their geographical distribution and potentially the cost involved. Online platforms such as Clickworker or Qualtrics do provide options to recruit participants with programming skill; however, misunderstandings and fraud can be an issue. This can result in participants without programming skill taking part in studies and surveys. If these participants are not detected, they can cause detrimental noise in the survey data. In this paper, we develop screener questions that are easy and quick to answer for people with programming skill but difficult to answer correctly for those without. In order to evaluate our questionnaire for efficacy and efficiency, we recruited several batches of participants with and without programming skill and tested the questions. In our batch 42% of Clickworkers stating that they have programming skill did not meet our criteria and we would recommend filtering these from studies. We also evaluated the questions in an adversarial setting. We conclude with a set of recommended questions which researchers can use to recruit participants with programming skill from online platforms.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Distilled GPT for Source Code Summarizationcited by 30
- 2024From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits?cited by 1
- 2025AI-Mediated Code Comment Improvementcited by 0
- 2025AI-Mediated Code Comment Improvement13 May 2025
- 2024From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits?18 Dec 2024
- 2023Distilled GPT for Source Code Summarization28 Aug 2023