The Effect of Q-function Reuse on the Total Regret of Tabular, Model-Free, Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Some reinforcement learning methods suffer from high sample complexity causing them to not be practical in real-world situations. Q-function reuse, a transfer learning method, is one way to reduce the sample complexity of learning, potentially improving usefulness of existing algorithms. Prior work has shown the empirical effectiveness of Q-function reuse for various environments when applied to model-free algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no theoretical work showing the regret of Q-function reuse when applied to the tabular, model-free setting. We aim to bridge the gap between theoretical and empirical work in Q-function reuse by providing some theoretical insights on the effectiveness of Q-function reuse when applied to the Q-learning with UCB-Hoeffding algorithm. Our main contribution is showing that in a specific case if Q-function reuse is applied to the Q-learning with UCB-Hoeffding algorithm it has a regret that is independent of the state or action space. We also provide empirical results supporting our theoretical findings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2021.
Builds on
3 of 6 references.
References · 3
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
- 2020Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 265
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2021Can Q-Learning be Improved with Advice?cited by 13
- 2023Robust Knowledge Transfer in Tiered Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2023Robust Knowledge Transfer in Tiered Reinforcement Learning10 Feb 2023
- 2021Can Q-Learning be Improved with Advice?25 Oct 2021