mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auto-tuning of Deep Neural Networks by Conflicting Layer Removal

arXiv 2103.04331 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing neural network architectures is a challenging task and knowing which specific layers of a model must be adapted to improve the performance is almost a mystery. In this paper, we introduce a novel methodology to identify layers that decrease the test accuracy of trained models. Conflicting layers are detected as early as the beginning of training. In the worst-case scenario, we prove that such a layer could lead to a network that cannot be trained at all. A theoretical analysis is provided on what is the origin of those layers that result in a lower overall network performance, which is complemented by our extensive empirical evaluation. More precisely, we identified those layers that worsen the performance because they would produce what we name conflicting training bundles. We will show that around 60% of the layers of trained residual networks can be completely removed from the architecture with no significant increase in the test-error. We will further present a novel neural-architecture-search (NAS) algorithm that identifies conflicting layers at the beginning of the training. Architectures found by our auto-tuning algorithm achieve competitive accuracy values when compared against more complex state-of-the-art architectures, while drastically reducing memory consumption and inference time for different computer vision tasks. The source code is available on https://github.com/peerdavid/conflicting-bundles

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2021.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  5. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  6. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  7. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
  8. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  9. 2016On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networkscited by 302
  10. 2015Highway Networkscited by 257
  11. 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 156
  12. 2019Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Activation Functioncited by 141
4 more
  1. 2015All you need is a good initcited by 124
  2. 2015Data-dependent Initializations of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 29
  3. 2018Norm-Preservation: Why Residual Networks Can Become Extremely Deep?cited by 12
  4. 2018Increasing the adversarial robustness and explainability of capsule networks with γ-capsulescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.