mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Human-Understandable Decision Making for Visual Recognition

arXiv 2103.03429 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2021cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of deep neural networks has achieved substantial success in many tasks. However, there still exists a huge gap between the operating mechanism of deep learning models and human-understandable decision making, so that humans cannot fully trust the predictions made by these models. To date, little work has been done on how to align the behaviors of deep learning models with human perception in order to train a human-understandable model. To fill this gap, we propose a new framework to train a deep neural network by incorporating the prior of human perception into the model learning process. Our proposed model mimics the process of perceiving conceptual parts from images and assessing their relative contributions towards the final recognition. The effectiveness of our proposed model is evaluated on two classical visual recognition tasks. The experimental results and analysis confirm our model is able to provide interpretable explanations for its predictions, but also maintain competitive recognition accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2021.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  5. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  6. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  7. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  8. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301
  9. 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 161
  10. 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
  11. 2017Building machines that adapt and compute like brainscited by 99
  12. 2019The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanationscited by 97
4 more
  1. 2020Interpretable and Accurate Fine-grained Recognition via Region Groupingcited by 75
  2. 2020The Devil is in the Channels: Mutual-Channel Loss for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 64
  3. 2017Improving Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks with Semantic Informationcited by 14
  4. 2019"Why did you do that?": Explaining black box models with Inductive Synthesiscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.