mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On MCMC for variationally sparse Gaussian processes: A pseudo-marginal approach

arXiv 2103.03321 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2021stat.CO stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gaussian processes (GPs) are frequently used in machine learning and statistics to construct powerful models. However, when employing GPs in practice, important considerations must be made, regarding the high computational burden, approximation of the posterior, choice of the covariance function and inference of its hyperparmeters. To address these issues, Hensman et al. (2015) combine variationally sparse GPs with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to derive a scalable, flexible and general framework for GP models. Nevertheless, the resulting approach requires intractable likelihood evaluations for many observation models. To bypass this problem, we propose a pseudo-marginal (PM) scheme that offers asymptotically exact inference as well as computational gains through doubly stochastic estimators for the intractable likelihood and large datasets. In complex models, the advantages of the PM scheme are particularly evident, and we demonstrate this on a two-level GP regression model with a nonparametric covariance function to capture non-stationarity.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2021.

Builds on

22 of 71 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  2. 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 383
  3. 2019Rates of Convergence for Sparse Variational Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 63
  4. 2015On Sparse variational methods and the Kullback-Leibler divergence between stochastic processescited by 57
  5. 2015On Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for tall datacited by 50
  6. 2019Deep Gaussian Processes for Multi-fidelity Modelingcited by 50
  7. 2015MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processescited by 44
  8. 2017A Case Study Competition Among Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Datacited by 44
  9. 2014Firefly Monte Carlo: Exact MCMC with Subsets of Datacited by 23
  10. 2014Speeding Up MCMC by Efficient Data Subsamplingcited by 18
  11. 2013On Russian Roulette Estimates for Bayesian Inference with Doubly-Intractable Likelihoodscited by 16
  12. 2019Banded Matrix Operators for Gaussian Markov Models in the Automatic Differentiation Eracited by 11
10 more
  1. 2016Parallelizable sparse inverse formulation Gaussian processes (SpInGP)cited by 10
  2. 2017Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Energy Conserving Subsamplingcited by 8
  3. 2020Probabilistic selection of inducing points in sparse Gaussian processescited by 8
  4. 2014Gaussian Process Volatility Modelcited by 7
  5. 2013Pseudo-Marginal Bayesian Inference for Gaussian Processescited by 5
  6. 2013Computer emulation with non-stationary Gaussian processescited by 4
  7. 2018Diagnostic-Driven Nonstationary Emulators Using Kernel Mixturescited by 4
  8. 2016The block-Poisson estimator for optimally tuned exact subsampling MCMCcited by 3
  9. 2013Bayesian Inference for Gaussian Process Classifiers with Annealing and Pseudo-Marginal MCMCcited by 1
  10. 2018Pseudo-marginal Bayesian inference for supervised Gaussian process latent variable modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.