mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The KL-Divergence between a Graph Model and its Fair I-Projection as a Fairness Regularizer

arXiv 2103.01846 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning and reasoning over graphs is increasingly done by means of probabilistic models, e.g. exponential random graph models, graph embedding models, and graph neural networks. When graphs are modeling relations between people, however, they will inevitably reflect biases, prejudices, and other forms of inequity and inequality. An important challenge is thus to design accurate graph modeling approaches while guaranteeing fairness according to the specific notion of fairness that the problem requires. Yet, past work on the topic remains scarce, is limited to debiasing specific graph modeling methods, and often aims to ensure fairness in an indirect manner. We propose a generic approach applicable to most probabilistic graph modeling approaches. Specifically, we first define the class of fair graph models corresponding to a chosen set of fairness criteria. Given this, we propose a fairness regularizer defined as the KL-divergence between the graph model and its I-projection onto the set of fair models. We demonstrate that using this fairness regularizer in combination with existing graph modeling approaches efficiently trades-off fairness with accuracy, whereas the state-of-the-art models can only make this trade-off for the fairness criterion that they were specifically designed for.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

14 of 37 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  5. 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
  6. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  7. 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
  8. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  9. 2019Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddingscited by 126
  10. 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
  11. 2020DeBayes: a Bayesian Method for Debiasing Network Embeddingscited by 55
  12. 2019The Fairness of Risk Scores Beyond Classification: Bipartite Ranking and the xAUC Metriccited by 41
2 more
  1. 2020All of the Fairness for Edge Prediction with Optimal Transportcited by 36
  2. 2018Conditional Network Embeddingscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

17 papers.

Sort: