Median Optimal Treatment Regimes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimal treatment regimes are personalized policies for making a treatment decision based on subject characteristics, with the policy chosen to maximize some value. It is common to aim to maximize the mean outcome in the population, via a regime assigning treatment only to those whose mean outcome is higher under treatment versus control. However, the mean can be an unstable measure of centrality, resulting in imprecise statistical procedures, as well as unrobust decisions that can be overly influenced by a small fraction of subjects. In this work, we propose a new median optimal treatment regime that instead treats individuals whose conditional median is higher under treatment. This ensures that optimal decisions for individuals from the same group are not overly influenced either by (i) a small fraction of the group (unlike the mean criterion), or (ii) unrelated subjects from different groups (unlike marginal median/quantile criteria). We introduce a new measure of value, the Average Conditional Median Effect (ACME), which summarizes across-group median treatment outcomes of a policy, and which the median optimal treatment regime maximizes. After developing key motivating examples that distinguish median optimal treatment regimes from mean and marginal median optimal treatment regimes, we give a nonparametric efficiency bound for estimating the ACME of a policy, and propose a new doubly robust-style estimator that achieves the efficiency bound under weak conditions. To construct the median optimal treatment regime, we introduce a new doubly robust-style estimator for the conditional median treatment effect. Finite-sample properties are explored via numerical simulations and the proposed algorithm is illustrated using data from a randomized clinical trial in patients with HIV.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.
Builds on
7 of 67 references.
References · 7
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 332
- 2020Learning Optimal Distributionally Robust Individualized Treatment Rulescited by 28
- 2018Sharp instruments for classifying compliers and generalizing causal effectscited by 22
- 2015Efficient Estimation of Quantiles in Missing Data Modelscited by 5
- 2016Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rulescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effectscited by 18
- 2025Automatic Debiased Machine Learning for Smooth Functionals of Nonparametric M-Estimandscited by 7
- 2021Ambiguous Dynamic Treatment Regimes: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 6
- 2023Policy Learning with Distributional Welfarecited by 5
- 2022Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Responsecited by 3
- 2024Learning Robust Treatment Rules for Censored Datacited by 1
- 2024Limits of Approximating the Median Treatment Effectcited by 0
- 2025Automatic Debiased Machine Learning for Smooth Functionals of Nonparametric M-Estimands21 Jan 2025
- 2024Learning Robust Treatment Rules for Censored Data17 Aug 2024
- 2024Limits of Approximating the Median Treatment Effect15 Mar 2024
- 2023Policy Learning with Distributional Welfare27 Nov 2023
- 2022Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects23 May 2022
- 2022Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response25 Feb 2022
- 2021Ambiguous Dynamic Treatment Regimes: A Reinforcement Learning Approach8 Dec 2021