mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Smoothness Analysis of Adversarial Training

arXiv 2103.01400 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Recent studies about adversarial robustness focus on the loss landscape in the parameter space since it is related to optimization and generalization performance. These studies conclude that the difficulty of adversarial training is caused by the non-smoothness of the loss function: i.e., its gradient is not Lipschitz continuous. However, this analysis ignores the dependence of adversarial attacks on model parameters. Since adversarial attacks are optimized for models, they should depend on the parameters. Considering this dependence, we analyze the smoothness of the loss function of adversarial training using the optimal attacks for the model parameter in more detail. We reveal that the constraint of adversarial attacks is one cause of the non-smoothness and that the smoothness depends on the types of the constraints. Specifically, the L_∞ constraint can cause non-smoothness more than the L2 constraint. Moreover, our analysis implies that if we flatten the loss function with respect to input data, the Lipschitz constant of the gradient of adversarial loss tends to increase. To address the non-smoothness, we show that EntropySGD smoothens the non-smooth loss and improves the performance of adversarial training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

29 of 40 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  6. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  7. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  8. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  9. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  10. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  11. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  12. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
17 more
  1. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
  2. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  3. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
  4. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  5. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
  6. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 288
  7. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
  8. 2018Lipschitz-Margin Training: Scalable Certification of Perturbation Invariance for Deep Neural Networkscited by 193
  9. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  10. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  11. 2017Improving Generalization Performance by Switching from Adam to SGDcited by 121
  12. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
  13. 2020On the Loss Landscape of Adversarial Training: Identifying Challenges and How to Overcome Themcited by 59
  14. 2018Evaluating and Understanding the Robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 34
  15. 2020Regret Bounds without Lipschitz Continuity: Online Learning with Relative-Lipschitz Lossescited by 11
  16. 2021Adversarial Training Makes Weight Loss Landscape Sharper in Logistic Regressioncited by 5
  17. 2020S-SGD: Symmetrical Stochastic Gradient Descent with Weight Noise Injection for Reaching Flat Minimacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.