mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

A Kernel Framework to Quantify a Model's Local Predictive Uncertainty under Data Distributional Shifts

arXiv 2103.01374 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional Bayesian approaches for model uncertainty quantification rely on notoriously difficult processes of marginalization over each network parameter to estimate its probability density function (PDF). Our hypothesis is that internal layer outputs of a trained neural network contain all of the information related to both its mapping function (quantified by its weights) as well as the input data distribution. We therefore propose a framework for predictive uncertainty quantification of a trained neural network that explicitly estimates the PDF of its raw prediction space (before activation), p(y'|x,w), which we refer to as the model PDF, in a Gaussian reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The Gaussian RKHS provides a localized density estimate of p(y'|x,w), which further enables us to utilize gradient based formulations of quantum physics to decompose the model PDF in terms of multiple local uncertainty moments that provide much greater resolution of the PDF than the central moments characterized by Bayesian methods. This provides the framework with a better ability to detect distributional shifts in test data away from the training data PDF learned by the model. We evaluate the framework against existing uncertainty quantification methods on benchmark datasets that have been corrupted using common perturbation techniques. The kernel framework is observed to provide model uncertainty estimates with much greater precision based on the ability to detect model prediction errors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

15 of 36 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,902
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,862
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,340
  6. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,614
  7. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,278
  8. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  9. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 520
  10. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 418
  11. 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 360
  12. 2018Deep Bayesian Bandits Showdown: An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian Deep Networks for Thompson Samplingcited by 168
3 more
  1. 2018Uncertainty in Neural Networks: Approximately Bayesian Ensemblingcited by 94
  2. 2018Projected BNNs: Avoiding weight-space pathologies by learning latent representations of neural network weightscited by 5
  3. 2020Towards a Kernel based Uncertainty Decomposition Framework for Data and Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.