mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Arguments for the Unsuitability of Convolutional Neural Networks for Non--Local Tasks

arXiv 2102.11944 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2021cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional neural networks have established themselves over the past years as the state of the art method for image classification, and for many datasets, they even surpass humans in categorizing images. Unfortunately, the same architectures perform much worse when they have to compare parts of an image to each other to correctly classify this image. Until now, no well-formed theoretical argument has been presented to explain this deficiency. In this paper, we will argue that convolutional layers are of little use for such problems, since comparison tasks are global by nature, but convolutional layers are local by design. We will use this insight to reformulate a comparison task into a sorting task and use findings on sorting networks to propose a lower bound for the number of parameters a neural network needs to solve comparison tasks in a generalizable way. We will use this lower bound to argue that attention, as well as iterative/recurrent processing, is needed to prevent a combinatorial explosion.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2021.

Builds on

5 of 15 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  3. 201625 years of CNNs: Can we compare to human abstraction capabilities?cited by 10
  4. 2020Five Points to Check when Comparing Visual Perception in Humans and Machinescited by 8
  5. 2018Same-different problems strain convolutional neural networkscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

2 papers.