mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Moral Decision-Making in Medical Hybrid Intelligent Systems: A Team Design Patterns Approach to the Bias Mitigation and Data Sharing Design Problems

arXiv 2102.11211 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2021cs.HC cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Increasing automation in the healthcare sector calls for a Hybrid Intelligence (HI) approach to closely study and design the collaboration of humans and autonomous machines. Ensuring that medical HI systems' decision-making is ethical is key. The use of Team Design Patterns (TDPs) can advance this goal by describing successful and reusable configurations of design problems in which decisions have a moral component, as well as through facilitating communication in multidisciplinary teams designing HI systems. For this research, TDPs were developed to describe a set of solutions for two design problems in a medical HI system: (1) mitigating harmful biases in machine learning algorithms and (2) sharing health and behavioral patient data with healthcare professionals and system developers. The Socio-Cognitive Engineering methodology was employed, integrating operational demands, human factors knowledge, and a technological analysis into a set of TDPs. A survey was created to assess the usability of the patterns on their understandability, effectiveness, and generalizability. The results showed that TDPs are a useful method to unambiguously describe solutions for diverse HI design problems with a moral component on varying abstraction levels, that are usable by a heterogeneous group of multidisciplinary researchers. Additionally, results indicated that the SCE approach and the developed questionnaire are suitable methods for creating and assessing TDPs. The study concludes with a set of proposed improvements to TDPs, including their integration with Interaction Design Patterns, the inclusion of several additional concepts, and a number of methodological improvements. Finally, the thesis recommends directions for future research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.

Builds on

5 of 72 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  2. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  3. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  4. 2019A Boxology of Design Patterns for Hybrid Learning and Reasoning Systemscited by 20
  5. 2015Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Datacited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.