Mechanism Design Powered by Social Interactions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mechanism design has traditionally assumed that the set of participants are fixed and known to the mechanism (the market owner) in advance. However, in practice, the market owner can only directly reach a small number of participants (her neighbours). Hence the owner often needs costly promotions to recruit more participants in order to get desirable outcomes such as social welfare or revenue maximization. In this paper, we propose to incentivize existing participants to invite their neighbours to attract more participants. However, they would not invite each other if they are competitors. We discuss how to utilize the conflict of interest between the participants to incentivize them to invite each other to form larger markets. We will highlight the early solutions and open the floor for discussing the fundamental open questions in the settings of auctions, coalitional games, matching and voting.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Manipulation and Peer Mechanisms: A Surveycited by 1
- 2022Multi-Unit Diffusion Auctions with Intermediariescited by 0
- 2025Strategyproofness and Monotone Allocation of Auction in Social Networkscited by 0
- 2025Strategyproofness and Monotone Allocation of Auction in Social Networks19 Jul 2025
- 2022Manipulation and Peer Mechanisms: A Survey5 Oct 2022
- 2022Multi-Unit Diffusion Auctions with Intermediaries15 Mar 2022