mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Lexical Complexity in English Texts: The Complex 2.0 Dataset

arXiv 2102.08773 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2021cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying words which may cause difficulty for a reader is an essential step in most lexical text simplification systems prior to lexical substitution and can also be used for assessing the readability of a text. This task is commonly referred to as Complex Word Identification (CWI) and is often modelled as a supervised classification problem. For training such systems, annotated datasets in which words and sometimes multi-word expressions are labelled regarding complexity are required. In this paper we analyze previous work carried out in this task and investigate the properties of CWI datasets for English. We develop a protocol for the annotation of lexical complexity and use this to annotate a new dataset, CompLex 2.0. We present experiments using both new and old datasets to investigate the nature of lexical complexity. We found that a Likert-scale annotation protocol provides an objective setting that is superior for identifying the complexity of words compared to a binary annotation protocol. We release a new dataset using our new protocol to promote the task of Lexical Complexity Prediction.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2021.

Builds on

8 of 95 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Linguistic Features for Readability Assessmentcited by 35
  2. 2018A Report on the Complex Word Identification Shared Task 2018cited by 30
  3. 2018A Word-Complexity Lexicon and A Neural Readability Ranking Model for Lexical Simplificationcited by 24
  4. 2020CompLex: A New Corpus for Lexical Complexity Prediction from Likert Scale Datacited by 24
  5. 2019Strong Baselines for Complex Word Identification across Multiple Languagescited by 9
  6. 2017Complex Word Identification: Challenges in Data Annotation and System Performancecited by 8
  7. 2018UnibucKernel: A kernel-based learning method for complex word identificationcited by 5
  8. 2017CLaC at SemEval-2016 Task 11: Exploring linguistic and psycho-linguistic Features for Complex Word Identificationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Language Variety Identification with True Labelscited by 12
  2. 2021UPB at SemEval-2021 Task 1: Combining Deep Learning and Hand-Crafted Features for Lexical Complexity Predictioncited by 5
  3. 2023Japanese Lexical Complexity for Non-Native Readers: A New Datasetcited by 5
  4. 2021LCP-RIT at SemEval-2021 Task 1: Exploring Linguistic Features for Lexical Complexity Predictioncited by 3
  5. 2022Domain Adaptation in Multilingual and Multi-Domain Monolingual Settings for Complex Word Identificationcited by 3
  6. 2023Lexical Complexity Prediction: An Overviewcited by 3
  7. 2021LAST at SemEval-2021 Task 1: Improving Multi-Word Complexity Prediction Using Bigram Association Measurescited by 2
  8. 2026RALS: Resources and Baselines for Romanian Automatic Lexical Simplificationcited by 1
  9. 2021OCHADAI-KYOTO at SemEval-2021 Task 1: Enhancing Model Generalization and Robustness for Lexical Complexity Predictioncited by 0
  10. 2024MultiLS: A Multi-task Lexical Simplification Frameworkcited by 0
  11. 2024Using Letter Positional Probabilities to Assess Word Complexitycited by 0
  12. 2025CEFR-Annotated WordNet: LLM-Based Proficiency-Guided Semantic Database for Language Learningcited by 0
3 more
  1. 2026Marginal Alignment Does Not Guarantee Joint-Distribution Fidelity: An Official-Reference Audit of Nemotron-Personas-Korea with Cross-Locale Replicationcited by 0
  2. 2026UOL@IDEM at BEA 2026 Shared Task 1: Neural Fusion and Feature-Rich Modeling for L1-Aware Vocabulary Difficulty Predictioncited by 0
  3. 2026SimpCue: Cue-Based Prompting for Multilingual Text Simplificationcited by 0