mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improper Reinforcement Learning with Gradient-based Policy Optimization

arXiv 2102.08201 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider an improper reinforcement learning setting where a learner is given M base controllers for an unknown Markov decision process, and wishes to combine them optimally to produce a potentially new controller that can outperform each of the base ones. This can be useful in tuning across controllers, learnt possibly in mismatched or simulated environments, to obtain a good controller for a given target environment with relatively few trials. par We propose a gradient-based approach that operates over a class of improper mixtures of the controllers. We derive convergence rate guarantees for the approach assuming access to a gradient oracle. The value function of the mixture and its gradient may not be available in closed-form; however, we show that we can employ rollouts and simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) for explicit gradient descent optimization. Numerical results on (i) the standard control theoretic benchmark of stabilizing an inverted pendulum and (ii) a constrained queueing task show that our improper policy optimization algorithm can stabilize the system even when the base policies at its disposal are unstablefootnoteUnder review. Please do not distribute..

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.

Builds on

19 of 50 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  4. 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 264
  5. 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
  6. 2019On the Theory of Policy Gradient Methods: Optimality, Approximation, and Distribution Shiftcited by 177
  7. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
  8. 2019Global Optimality Guarantees For Policy Gradient Methodscited by 150
  9. 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
  10. 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 118
  11. 2017Learning Unknown Markov Decision Processes: A Thompson Sampling Approachcited by 65
  12. 2020Black-Box Control for Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 43
7 more
  1. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators Efficientlycited by 35
  2. 2013From average case complexity to improper learning complexitycited by 16
  3. 2013Efficient Reinforcement Learning for High Dimensional Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 13
  4. 2019Boosting for Control of Dynamical Systemscited by 7
  5. 2020Regret Analysis of a Markov Policy Gradient Algorithm for Multi-arm Banditscited by 6
  6. 2013More data speeds up training time in learning halfspaces over sparse vectorscited by 4
  7. 2020Throughput Optimal Decentralized Scheduling with Single-bit State Feedback for a Class of Queueing Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.