How Convolutional Neural Networks Deal with Aliasing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The convolutional neural network (CNN) remains an essential tool in solving computer vision problems. Standard convolutional architectures consist of stacked layers of operations that progressively downscale the image. Aliasing is a well-known side-effect of downsampling that may take place: it causes high-frequency components of the original signal to become indistinguishable from its low-frequency components. While downsampling takes place in the max-pooling layers or in the strided-convolutions in these models, there is no explicit mechanism that prevents aliasing from taking place in these layers. Due to the impressive performance of these models, it is natural to suspect that they, somehow, implicitly deal with this distortion. The question we aim to answer in this paper is simply: "how and to what extent do CNNs counteract aliasing?" We explore the question by means of two examples: In the first, we assess the CNNs capability of distinguishing oscillations at the input, showing that the redundancies in the intermediate channels play an important role in succeeding at the task; In the second, we show that an image classifier CNN while, in principle, capable of implementing anti-aliasing filters, does not prevent aliasing from taking place in the intermediate layers.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2021.
Builds on
10 of 17 references.
References · 10
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 390
- 2018Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?cited by 198
- 2020Delving Deeper into Anti-aliasing in ConvNetscited by 60
- 2020An Effective Anti-Aliasing Approach for Residual Networkscited by 23
- 2015Geodesics of learned representationscited by 14
- 2019WaveCycleGAN2: Time-domain Neural Post-filter for Speech Waveform Generationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operatorscited by 54
- 2022The Lie Derivative for Measuring Learned Equivariancecited by 51
- 2023Deep networks for system identification: a Surveycited by 35
- 2022Learning strides in convolutional neural networkscited by 25
- 2022Aliasing is a Driver of Adversarial Attackscited by 1
- 2023A New Multimodal Medical Image Fusion based on Laplacian Autoencoder with Channel Attentioncited by 0
- 2025SUPER Module for Detail-Sensitive and Cost-Efficient U-Net Variant Decoderscited by 0
- 2025SOMA: Feature Gradient Enhanced Affine-Flow Matching for SAR-Optical Registrationcited by 0
- 2026DLink: Distilling Layer-wise and Dominant Knowledge from EEG Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026DLink: Distilling Layer-wise and Dominant Knowledge from EEG Foundation Models16 Apr 2026
- 2025SOMA: Feature Gradient Enhanced Affine-Flow Matching for SAR-Optical Registration17 Nov 2025
- 2025SUPER Module for Detail-Sensitive and Cost-Efficient U-Net Variant Decoders14 Nov 2025
- 2023A New Multimodal Medical Image Fusion based on Laplacian Autoencoder with Channel Attention18 Oct 2023
- 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operators18 Jun 2023
- 2023Deep networks for system identification: a Survey30 Jan 2023
- 2022Aliasing is a Driver of Adversarial Attacks22 Dec 2022
- 2022The Lie Derivative for Measuring Learned Equivariance6 Oct 2022
- 2022Learning strides in convolutional neural networks3 Feb 2022