mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning image quality assessment by reinforcing task amenable data selection

arXiv 2102.07615 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we consider a type of image quality assessment as a task-specific measurement, which can be used to select images that are more amenable to a given target task, such as image classification or segmentation. We propose to train simultaneously two neural networks for image selection and a target task using reinforcement learning. A controller network learns an image selection policy by maximising an accumulated reward based on the target task performance on the controller-selected validation set, whilst the target task predictor is optimised using the training set. The trained controller is therefore able to reject those images that lead to poor accuracy in the target task. In this work, we show that the controller-predicted image quality can be significantly different from the task-specific image quality labels that are manually defined by humans. Furthermore, we demonstrate that it is possible to learn effective image quality assessment without using a ``clean'' validation set, thereby avoiding the requirement for human labelling of images with respect to their amenability for the task. Using 6712, labelled and segmented, clinical ultrasound images from 259 patients, experimental results on holdout data show that the proposed image quality assessment achieved a mean classification accuracy of 0.94±0.01 and a mean segmentation Dice of 0.89±0.02, by discarding 5% and 15% of the acquired images, respectively. The significantly improved performance was observed for both tested tasks, compared with the respective 0.90±0.01 and 0.82±0.02 from networks without considering task amenability. This enables image quality feedback during real-time ultrasound acquisition among many other medical imaging applications.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2021.

Builds on

11 of 23 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  5. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  6. 2019Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 115
  7. 2019AM-LFS: AutoML for Loss Function Searchcited by 29
  8. 2020Comparing Different Deep Learning Architectures for Classification of Chest Radiographscited by 24
  9. 2020Searching Learning Strategy with Reinforcement Learning for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 16
  10. 2020Auto-weighting for Breast Cancer Classification in Multimodal Ultrasoundcited by 9
  11. 2020Image quality assessment for closed-loop computer-assisted lung ultrasoundcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

5 papers.