Estimation and Applications of Quantiles in Deep Binary Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantile regression, based on check loss, is a widely used inferential paradigm in Econometrics and Statistics. The conditional quantiles provide a robust alternative to classical conditional means, and also allow uncertainty quantification of the predictions, while making very few distributional assumptions. We consider the analogue of check loss in the binary classification setting. We assume that the conditional quantiles are smooth functions that can be learnt by Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Subsequently, we compute the Lipschitz constant of the proposed loss, and also show that its curvature is bounded, under some regularity conditions. Consequently, recent results on the error rates and DNN architecture complexity become directly applicable. We quantify the uncertainty of the class probabilities in terms of prediction intervals, and develop individualized confidence scores that can be used to decide whether a prediction is reliable or not at scoring time. By aggregating the confidence scores at the dataset level, we provide two additional metrics, model confidence, and retention rate, to complement the widely used classifier summaries. We also the robustness of the proposed non-parametric binary quantile classification framework are also studied, and we demonstrate how to obtain several univariate summary statistics of the conditional distributions, in particular conditional means, using smoothed conditional quantiles, allowing the use of explanation techniques like Shapley to explain the mean predictions. Finally, we demonstrate an efficient training regime for this loss based on Stochastic Gradient Descent with Lipschitz Adaptive Learning Rates (LALR).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.
Builds on
19 of 50 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
- 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 207
7 more
- 2018A modern maximum-likelihood theory for high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 81
- 2018Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inferencecited by 62
- 2016Gradients of Counterfactualscited by 31
- 2019Cross-Entropy Loss and Low-Rank Features Have Responsibility for Adversarial Examplescited by 17
- 2020A Framework for Democratizing AIcited by 4
- 2020Parsimonious Computing: A Minority Training Regime for Effective Prediction in Large Microarray Expression Data Setscited by 1
- 2020LALR: Theoretical and Experimental validation of Lipschitz Adaptive Learning Rate in Regression and Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
3 papers.